Friday, July 13, 2018

Teacher Disposition Essay (Fall 2017)


Another world is shaping up in the poverty of global capitalism.  To defend life, dignity and equality, a critical, well-versed populace must challenge the insidious subtleties of power structures and the influence of propaganda over their lives and communities.  To discern and disrupt authoritarian trends and the mass media that panders to power, warrior-scholars must live and teach in a state of critique (Coffey 7).  Driving this revolt against the dominant order begins with asking: to what extent are we in control of our own thoughts? Ideologies? And lives? Through examining the nature of individual socialization, students can begin to uncover the effects of the carceral state in themselves, their communities, global governing institutions and the ideologies that sustain power relations.  This is what is meant by scaffolding liberation.  In Freire-ian terms, we must model the deconstructing of the “oppressor consciousness” within ourselves while replacing it with “a critical awareness of oppression through the praxis of…struggle” (Freire Chp. 1).
               “At all times education is a political act, and schools are embedded within a sociocultural reality that benefits some at the expense of others” (Morrell and Scherff xiii).  The warrior-scholar finds a constructive niche by practicing critical literacies with young people in the halls of public education, but not without resistance from the institutions themselves.  Anne Ruggles Gere offers six purposes for education in the US: “to improve morality, prepare good workers, create an elite, produce good citizens, foster personal growth and offset inequity” (24).  These six reasons all exist to sustain or re-adjust outliers to the dominant order and any tendency towards social justice perhaps through “producing good citizens” to “offsetting inequity” can only be taken as a false solution – a quick fix for alleviating the social tensions produced by global capitalism.   
               In the Critical English classroom, this means remaining vigilant against perpetuating the ideologies of the ruling class along with the authoritarian relationship Freire refers to as the “banking concept of education” (Freire Chp. 2).    By democratically selecting multimodal texts and examining them in a critical constructivist framework, can the warrior-scholar work with students to promote the outgrowth of a critical literacy that can be applied to social, economic and political realities in the world.  To begin to scaffold liberation, an emphasis must be placed on “procedural knowledge – that is, the knowledge of how to do things,” namely, how to challenge and change oppressive structures (Smagorinsky 21).  The procedural knowledge of discerning texts, institutions, and events begins with asking: “Who benefits?” and “Who pays?” and essentially never ends.  A focus on fiction pieces will strengthen an individual’s reading stamina (a requirement for engaging the world critically as compared to the status-quo-supporting means of quick-bite social media) while expanding perspective, possibility and empathy (Alsup 183).  In approaching literature, it’s imperative to do away with traditional fixed notions of comprehension but rather construct individual meaning through purposeful sense making events (Aukerman 55-56).  In encountering the varying types of literacies, research across the socio-political spectrum will be emphasized.  To channel Aristotle through Rage Against the Machine, “the educated revolutionary mind must be able to entertain a thought without accepting it to better know one’s enemy.”  At the same time, as literacy becomes intimately tied to the technological society, the ‘message in the medium’ must be critically examined considering rampant climate change and exploitative labor practices.  Finally, “the ability to deconstruct dominant texts is not enough for critical English education; students must also develop the skills to create their own critical texts that can be used in the struggle for social justice” (Coffey 13-14).  The warrior-scholar understands the student doesn’t need to be given a voice, but rather be allowed to lead with the voice they’ve developed through their own personal experiences and analysis.
               All of this takes time and immense energy.  Dominant ideologies, institutions and propaganda mechanisms are firmly embedded in the United States, but power unchecked will continue to create inequality, violence and environmental destruction.  The warrior-scholar remains patient in creating another world in the shell of the old, a world where it is easy to be more human because when we love ourselves and our communities we are good.
               

No comments:

Post a Comment